<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BeatPoker &#187; Cash Games</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/category/cashgamestrategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk</link>
	<description>Poker Strategies News Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:56:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Brandon Adams &#8211; Hand Coordination.</title>
		<link>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/brandon-adams-hand-coordination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/brandon-adams-hand-coordination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beatpoker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cash Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand coordination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatpoker.co.uk/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hand coordination is the relative strength of your hand compared to your opponents’ hand, and it’s probably the single biggest factor determining whether you have a good or bad session playing poker. If it’s working in your favor, whenever you flop a monster, one of your opponents will also make a big hand, just not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hand coordination is the relative strength of your hand compared to your opponents’ hand, and it’s probably the single biggest factor determining whether you have a good or bad session playing poker. If it’s working in your favor, whenever you flop a monster, one of your opponents will also make a big hand, just not quite as big as yours. In this situation, playing your hand as fast as possible usually gives you the best chance to make the most money. </p>
<p>Say you’re playing Hold ‘em and you’re in a four-way pot, the board comes 9-9-4, and you have pocket fours. You want to play this hand fast for two reasons. The first is that you’re hoping one of your opponents has a 9. If so, he might raise you, allowing you to reraise him. Ideally, he’ll call, then call you again on the turn and the river, and you’ll make a lot of money. </p>
<p>The other reason you want to play this hand fast is that, if you check, it’s quite possible your opponents will also check. Then, if the turn brings a 6 and one of your opponents has pocket sixes and makes a bigger full house, you’re going to lose a huge amount of money. Giving a free card and losing an enormous pot when you could have won a small pot (if only you’d bet) is one of the biggest mistakes you can make in poker.</p>
<p>Now let’s say the flop comes K-J-J, and you have pocket kings. You’re not as likely to cost yourself your entire stack by slowplaying in this situation. It’s extremely unlikely that your opponent is going to be behind on the flop and yet make a hand on the turn that beats you, but I still think you should play it fast. You’ll win more money by betting the whole way because any player holding a jack is, at the very least, going to call you down, and he might even raise you. On the flop you just have to put out the line and hope that one of your opponents has a jack, or better yet, K-J.</p>
<p>If you play it slow in this situation, you’re giving away the strength of your hand. If you check on the flop with the idea of check-raising, then when you do put in the raise you’re telling your opponent you’ve made a huge hand and are giving him the opportunity to lay down a jack. You’ll make far more money by simply betting the whole way.</p>
<p>However, slowplaying a monster is occasionally the better play. Suppose you raise from middle position with A-Q of hearts, the button and the big blind both call, and the flop comes 6-7-2, all hearts. If the big blind checks, you should check too. If the button bets, you can then raise because he’s either buffing, in which case you’re not going to win any more money from him, or he’s also flopped a flush, in which case you want to get your money into the pot as quickly as possible in hopes of winning his entire stack, or he’s flopped a set, in which case he’ll call your check-raise on the flop and he’ll call a big bet on the turn and he might even call a big bet on the river.</p>
<p>If the board pairs on the turn, you should still bet. It’s such a draw heavy board that your opponent might think you only have the ace of hearts in your hand, or the ace of hearts and a pair, or the ace of hearts and another ace. There are a lot of hands he could put you on in this spot besides the nut flush so, even if the board pairs, you should keep betting for value, hoping to get called by a worse hand. </p>
<p>If you bet the turn and your opponent puts in a stiff raise, then you should reevaluate. If you bet the turn and he calls and you bet the river and he raises, then you should fold because you can credibly put him on a full house.</p>
<p>Because hand coordination plays such an important role in determining your long-term success, you need to make as much money as you possibly can when it’s working in your favor, and one of the best ways of doing that is playing fast after you flop a big hand.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/pro-tip/BrandonAdams/184">Source.</a></p>
<img src="http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=275&type=feed" alt=" Brandon Adams   Hand Coordination."  title="Brandon Adams   Hand Coordination." />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/brandon-adams-hand-coordination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Andy Bloch &#8211; Semi Bluffing.</title>
		<link>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/andy-bloch-semi-bluffing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/andy-bloch-semi-bluffing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beatpoker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cash Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Bloch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semi bluff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatpoker.co.uk/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The semi-bluff is one of the most powerful weapons in any poker player’s arsenal. If there’s a decent chance you can steal a pot by semi-bluffing, you should usually take it. But, as with any play you make at the table, the semi-bluff is always most effective when you use it at the correct time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The semi-bluff is one of the most powerful weapons in any poker player’s arsenal. If there’s a decent chance you can steal a pot by semi-bluffing, you should usually take it. But, as with any play you make at the table, the semi-bluff is always most effective when you use it at the correct time in the correct situation. Semi-bluff too much and your opponents will know when you’re on the draw; semi-bluff too little and your opponents will know to fold whenever you bet. The key to semi-bluffing is to always mix things up and never become too predictable with your betting patterns.</p>
<p>Let’s say that you’ve flopped the nut flush draw and are pretty certain your opponent has connected with the flop in some way, be it top pair or maybe even a set. A lot of players like to check-raise as a semi-bluff in this spot. There are a couple of problems with this play: first, if you always check-raise in this spot then your opponent will be able to put you on a draw very easily. Second, if your opponent really does have a hand, there’s no need to check-raise here because there’s no way he’s folding and there’s a good chance he’ll pay you off anyway if you hit your hand.</p>
<p>A better move in this spot might be not semi-bluffing and just calling instead. This way, if you hit your flush on the turn, your options are wide open – checking, calling or raising are all viable plays ? and your opponent won’t be able to put you on a hand quite as easily. By not semi-bluffing, you increase your chances of winning a bigger pot when your opponent actually has a strong hand. There are players out there who’ll assume you’re not on the draw if you don’t semi-bluff, so use that to your advantage.</p>
<p>Now, if you don’t think that your opponent has a strong hand or your draw isn’t that strong (say a low flush draw), this is the perfect time for a semi-bluff. The semi-bluff should be used as a tool to steal pots when the opportunity arises, not as a means of building big pots.</p>
<p>Another good way to mix up your semi-bluffing game plan is to wait until the turn to semi-bluff rather than always doing it on the flop. This can be a dangerous play because you’ve only got one card to come on the turn and you’re not getting the same odds. But it also means that your opponent is less likely to think that you’re semi-bluffing and put you on the draw. It looks pretty strong if you call on the flop and then raise on the turn; your opponent might think you’ve flopped the nuts and throw away a pretty strong hand.</p>
<p>Another advantage to semi-bluffing on the turn rather than the flop is that you could pick up additional outs on the turn. Say you have a gut-shot straight draw on the flop and then pick up a flush draw on the turn. You’ve just gone from four outs to about 12, which might be worth a shot at taking down the pot right then and there. A lot of players will also have trouble putting you on the flush draw in this spot; it’s just harder to see that flush draw on the turn than it is on the flop.</p>
<p>Once again, the key to a good semi-bluff is picking the right spot to pull it off. Choose poorly and you could stand to lose a good portion of your stack; choose well and you could throw your opponents off balance and hit them where it hurts when you make your hand.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/pro-tip/AndyBloch/175">Source.</a></p>
<img src="http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=269&type=feed" alt=" Andy Bloch   Semi Bluffing."  title="Andy Bloch   Semi Bluffing." />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/andy-bloch-semi-bluffing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kenny Tran &#8211; Overcards in Early Position.</title>
		<link>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/kenny-tran-overcards-in-early-position/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/kenny-tran-overcards-in-early-position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beatpoker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cash Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overcards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatpoker.co.uk/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, Andy Bloch wrote about the perils and pitfalls of playing big cards &#8211; A-K, A-Q, etc. &#8211; when they don&#8217;t connect with the flop. Like Andy, I think learning to play these kinds of hands well, adds an important weapon to any player&#8217;s arsenal. Of course, like any weapon, you have to approach these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, Andy Bloch wrote about the perils and pitfalls of playing big cards &#8211; A-K, A-Q, etc. &#8211; when they don&#8217;t connect with the flop. Like Andy, I think learning to play these kinds of hands well, adds an important weapon to any player&#8217;s arsenal. Of course, like any weapon, you have to approach these hands carefully to ensure that they don&#8217;t blow up in your face.</p>
<p>One of the most important safety tips I can give in regards to &#8220;big&#8221; hands is to be especially cautious when you&#8217;re playing them from early position. I believe in this so strongly in fact that I won&#8217;t even play A-Q unsuited from under the gun at a full table. It&#8217;s just too easy to get into trouble with this hand and cost yourself valuable chips.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the smartest thing you can do with hands like A-K in early position is mix up your play as much as possible. That means you&#8217;re going to sometimes want to raise with these hands and, at other times, you&#8217;re going to want to limp with them. Why? Because by mixing up how you play in early position, you&#8217;ll make it harder for your opponents to figure out what kinds of hands you really are playing. Of course, there are some other things to keep in mind when adopting this strategy, the most important of which is that if you&#8217;re going to limp with big hands in early position, you also need to limp with small hands like 6-7 suited.</p>
<p>By the same token, if you&#8217;re going to be raising with hands like A-K, you also need to sometimes raise with your smaller hands. Of course, you don&#8217;t want to play complete garbage from under the gun, but you shouldn&#8217;t be scared to sometimes pop the pot with a less than premium holding. If you get called, you may hit something like two pair on the flop and, if you get re-raised before the flop, you can easily throw your hand away without costing yourself too many chips. Again, it comes down to keeping your opponents off-guard.</p>
<p>While some players argue that you should always raise your big hands, I think limping with something like A-K in early position provides another potential benefit. For example, let&#8217;s say I limp from under the gun and three other players limp behind me before the button puts in a raise. Because of the amount of money in the pot, it&#8217;s likely that the button is raising with a very wide range of hands. Depending on my read, I might just flat-call his raise and try to out-play him after the flop or I might even re-raise before the flop and try to take down a substantial pot right then and there.</p>
<p>If I had raised with my A-K in this position, chances are that none of the limpers would have put any chips in the pot and I might only get flat called by the player on the button. By limping with my hand, I can get some extra money in the pot and put myself in a position to re-raise pre-flop. If the button was just trying to steal from position, he&#8217;s likely to lay down and let me take the pot. If he calls, I can play the hand cautiously if I miss the flop and, possibly, take a down a monster pot if I connect.</p>
<p>Of course, there&#8217;s no &#8220;right&#8221; way to play a hand like A-K from early position. Instead, look around your table and determine what kind of opponents you&#8217;re facing, and how aggressively you want to play against them. Mix up your game and you should be able to make your big hands pay off at crucial times.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/pro-tip/KennyTran/152">Source.</a></p>
<img src="http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=255&type=feed" alt=" Kenny Tran   Overcards in Early Position."  title="Kenny Tran   Overcards in Early Position." />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/kenny-tran-overcards-in-early-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jordan Morgan &#8211; Interpreting Three Bets.</title>
		<link>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/jordan-morgan-interpreting-three-bets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/jordan-morgan-interpreting-three-bets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beatpoker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cash Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-bets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3bets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three bets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatpoker.co.uk/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that a three-bet is supposed to mean strength. When a player three-bets before the flop, he’s saying that he believes he has the best hand. One of the keys to making money at the poker table, however, is being able to interpret when the three-bet means what it’s supposed to mean, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that a three-bet is supposed to mean strength. When a player three-bets before the flop, he’s saying that he believes he has the best hand. One of the keys to making money at the poker table, however, is being able to interpret when the three-bet means what it’s supposed to mean, and when a player is only representing a big hand and making a move.</p>
<p>The fact of the matter is that you’re not getting the right odds in most situations to call a three-bet with a small pocket pair. When there’s been a raise and a re-raise in front of you and you look down at a hand like pocket 6s, you normally want to fold it and move on. You can sometimes get away with making the call with a very deep stack, but you really have to have a strong read that you’re going to get paid if you make your hand. I might call with pocket 9s or 10s in the right spot against the right opponent, but hands like 8s or 7s just don’t play well enough, especially out of position.</p>
<p>One exception, of course, is if a particular player three-bets repeatedly. This suggests he isn’t always doing it with strong hands and it might be worth playing back at him. However, when I say “repeatedly,” I don’t just mean a couple of times early in a session. If a guy three-bets you twice early on, you might be inclined to think that he’s picking on you and doesn’t have a hand. But it could also be that the guy got dealt big hands twice. Until he has three-bet you relentlessly or shown down a weak holding after three-betting, you don’t want to try to make a play at him. Once he has done it several times, then it’s worth making a play at the pot if he puts in another three-bet, because he’s not going to have the premium hand that he’s representing that often.</p>
<p>Another thing to watch out for is the tiny three-bet. Say it’s a $1/$2 game, I raise to $6, and another player raises to $10 or $12 instead of something more standard like $15 or $18. When people make a tiny three-bet, I’ll usually call that. I don’t give a lot of respect to those plays. Sometimes they will be huge hands, but more often they’ll be very weak hands that you can take the pot from out of position.</p>
<p>A very small three-bet is not a tactic that I’ll use very often – there isn’t much reason for it. If you’re trying to steal a pot, you want to make it more difficult for your opponent to call. If you actually have a big hand, you want to get value for it when your opponent calls, so a bigger three-bet is a better idea.</p>
<p>Facing a three-bet can be a daunting prospect at times – be certain you have a good read on your opponent before making your next move.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/pro-tip/JordanMorgan/170">Source.</a></p>
<img src="http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=245&type=feed" alt=" Jordan Morgan   Interpreting Three Bets."  title="Jordan Morgan   Interpreting Three Bets." />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/jordan-morgan-interpreting-three-bets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Roberts &#8211; Breaking Out of Your Comfort Zone.</title>
		<link>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/ben-roberts-breaking-out-of-your-comfort-zone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/ben-roberts-breaking-out-of-your-comfort-zone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beatpoker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cash Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatpoker.co.uk/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many beginner poker players naturally gravitate toward a level of game where they feel most comfortable. The reasons for their choice may vary, but often include the size of their starting bankroll, and the amount of money they feel comfortable wagering in a particular hand or throughout a session. This is perfectly normal and reasonable. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many beginner poker players naturally gravitate toward a level of game where they feel most comfortable. The reasons for their choice may vary, but often include the size of their starting bankroll, and the amount of money they feel comfortable wagering in a particular hand or throughout a session.</p>
<p>This is perfectly normal and reasonable. One of the things that separate truly profitable players from winning players, however, is their willingness to step out of their comfort zone and explore higher limit games.</p>
<p>After a few hundred hours of play, many people can determine whether or not they are beating their regular games. For those players who are showing a profit, there are some for whom taking home an extra $100 or $200 per week is perfectly acceptable. They&#8217;re mainly playing for fun and the winnings are a nice benefit. For others, however, poker may be a steady source of income, and boosting their bottom line could significantly affect their lives away from the table.</p>
<p>One of the smartest things these players can do is to stretch their games and play at higher limits. With proper planning, and the right approach, the rewards can be immeasurable. To that end, I have some suggestions for players who are thinking about taking their game to the next level.</p>
<p>First and most important, make sure you have the bankroll to sustain yourself at a higher level. If you take a shot and lose, you shouldn&#8217;t have to worry about rebuilding your bankroll from scratch. A good recommendation is to stockpile enough money so that you can comfortably afford between eight and 10 buy-ins before you have to retreat to a smaller game.</p>
<p>This leads to my second piece of advice, which is not to let a few losing sessions affect your attitude or impair your judgment. I&#8217;m not saying that losing doesn&#8217;t sting and that tilt doesn&#8217;t happen. They do. But, players who successfully move up the ladder understand that not every session will be a winning one, and that by constantly analyzing their games &#8211; and those of their opponents&#8217; &#8211; they&#8217;ll be able to make adjustments that will help them succeed.</p>
<p>When moving up the poker ladder, you&#8217;ll inevitably encounter players with more experience and skill than you possess. Recognizing these players and learning from them is one of the smartest moves you can make. Conversely, letting your ego and pride get in the way of observing these players can lead you to keep investing money in a losing situation and, eventually, affect your overall performance and excitement toward the game.</p>
<p>Remember, successful people fail more often than unsuccessful people. Successful people try new things, fall down, pick themselves up, and try again. So, if your first attempt to move up to a higher stakes game falls short of your expectations, don&#8217;t despair. Look at your play and the play of your opponents, regroup, and try again. The experience will be worth it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/pro-tip/BenRoberts/78">Source.</a></p>
<img src="http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=180&type=feed" alt=" Ben Roberts   Breaking Out of Your Comfort Zone."  title="Ben Roberts   Breaking Out of Your Comfort Zone." />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/ben-roberts-breaking-out-of-your-comfort-zone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kristy Gazes &#8211; The Mindset of a Winner.</title>
		<link>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/kristy-gazes-the-mindset-of-a-winner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/kristy-gazes-the-mindset-of-a-winner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beatpoker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cash Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixed games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatpoker.co.uk/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s one of the most interesting things about poker: A player can be incredibly knowledgeable and talented, and still be a long-term loser. I&#8217;ve been playing professionally for more than a decade and, in that time, I&#8217;ve seen any number of sharp, gifted players go broke again and again. How is it that I&#8217;ve been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one of the most interesting things about poker: A player can be incredibly knowledgeable and talented, and still be a long-term loser. I&#8217;ve been playing professionally for more than a decade and, in that time, I&#8217;ve seen any number of sharp, gifted players go broke again and again. How is it that I&#8217;ve been able to survive while others have busted out? I think there are a few factors that contribute to my success.</p>
<p>As I discussed in a previous tip, my money management skills are good. So when I hit the inevitable losing streak, I don&#8217;t risk going broke. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, it&#8217;s impossible to overstate the importance of money management to your poker career.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also benefited from being a mixed-game player. At the Commerce Casino, I play in a rotation game that can include Omaha Hi/Lo, Stud Hi/Lo, Triple Draw, and Badugi. I like the mixed games for a couple of reasons. First off, playing a mix of games helps keep me sharp and interested. Sometimes, when I play one game continually for hours on end, I can get a little antsy.</p>
<p>In addition, there are usually a couple of players who play some games well, but aren&#8217;t quite as skilled in others. This gives me a nice edge. And the truth is, even at higher limits, there are players who don&#8217;t understand some of the games all that well. They see too many flops in Omaha Hi/Lo and draw too frequently in Triple Draw and Badugi.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s another great advantage to this sort of mixed game. Games like Omaha Hi/Lo and Badgui appeal to gamblers &#8211; players who like to get involved in pots and mix it up. Some of these guys are quite talented, but after missing a draw in Badgui or failing to connect on the river in Omaha, they can go on tilt. Then, for a period of time &#8211; maybe 15 minutes, maybe an hour &#8211; they play every game badly.</p>
<p>Perhaps the greatest advantage I have over my opponents is that I&#8217;m able to control my emotions. I don&#8217;t tilt easily. And when I do feel myself getting upset, I have the discipline to get up from the table and go home. I know that the game will be there tomorrow and I&#8217;ll be far more prepared for the action after some rest. Over the years, I&#8217;ve encountered many players who play about as well as I do, but I&#8217;ve fared much better then they have because I can control my response to adversity.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking to improve your results, try learning some new games. There&#8217;s a lot of fun and profit outside of Hold &#8216;em. And work on your emotional control. Staying off tilt may be the most important thing you can do for your bankroll.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/pro-tip/KristyGazes/83">Source.</a></p>
<img src="http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=164&type=feed" alt=" Kristy Gazes   The Mindset of a Winner."  title="Kristy Gazes   The Mindset of a Winner." />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/kristy-gazes-the-mindset-of-a-winner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perry Friedman &#8211; Getting Beyond Your Cards</title>
		<link>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/perry-friedman-getting-beyond-your-cards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/perry-friedman-getting-beyond-your-cards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beatpoker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cash Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatpoker.co.uk/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spend a lot of time playing in the low-limit Stud games on Full Tilt Poker. In those games, I&#8217;ve encountered a number of players who haven&#8217;t come to understand one of poker&#8217;s fundamental concepts. These beginners focus only on their own cards; they don&#8217;t stop to think about the cards their opponents might hold. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spend a lot of time playing in the low-limit Stud games on Full Tilt Poker. In those games, I&#8217;ve encountered a number of players who haven&#8217;t come to understand one of poker&#8217;s fundamental concepts. These beginners focus only on their own cards; they don&#8217;t stop to think about the cards their opponents might hold.</p>
<p>To take a typical example from Stud. I&#8217;ve seen players call with low and medium pairs after there has been a raise and a re-raise in front of them. These players are so fixated on their own cards that they don&#8217;t stop to ask what hands they&#8217;re likely up against. And in these spots, the betting tells a pretty disturbing tale. You can see how one player might raise with something like three high cards, so a pair of 5s or 7s could be best. But a re-raise? That&#8217;s an indication of serious strength. At that point, a player should look at his pair and figure that, in all likelihood, he&#8217;s up against a higher pair, making his smaller pair a big underdog. Folding is the only proper action.</p>
<p>A winning poker player won&#8217;t just evaluate a situation at the start of the hand. He will constantly reassess as more information becomes available. Another example from Stud shows what I mean. Say a player raises on Third Street with the 4d as his up-card and I call with split 9s and a Jack kicker. We play heads-up and Fourth Street gives me a blank, the 5c, while my opponent catches the 8d, giving him two suited cards. He bets and I call. Then on Fifth, he catches another suited card, the Qd, and I make two pair with Jh. He bets again, representing the flush. Could he have caught the flush? It&#8217;s possible. But in this case, when I try to determine what my opponent might have, I have to move beyond the cards that I&#8217;m currently seeing. I need to consider the actions throughout the hand.</p>
<p>I remember that on Third Street, the player raised with a 4 as his door card. Normally, players who are trying to draw to a flush will try to get in cheap on Third Street; they typically limp and then perhaps, call a raise. So while it&#8217;s possible that this player started with something like Ad-Kd-4d, it&#8217;s far more likely that he started with something like a middle or big pair in the hole. When I put all this information together, I see that despite the opponent&#8217;s scary board, two pair is probably ahead, and I can react accordingly by either calling bets or raising.</p>
<p>This sort of thinking applies to all poker games. Moving beyond your own cards is a key step in coming to think like a winning player. The most sophisticated players in the game think a level deeper still &#8211; they consider not only what their opponents hold, but what their opponents think they hold. But that&#8217;s the subject for another tip.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/pro-tip/PerryFriedman/84">Source.</a></p>
<img src="http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=161&type=feed" alt=" Perry Friedman   Getting Beyond Your Cards "  title="Perry Friedman   Getting Beyond Your Cards " />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/perry-friedman-getting-beyond-your-cards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gavin Smith &#8211;  Pot-Size Manipulation.</title>
		<link>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/gavin-smith-pot-size-manipulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/gavin-smith-pot-size-manipulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beatpoker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cash Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pot control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pot size]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatpoker.co.uk/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the key skills that winning big-bet players bring to the table is the ability to manipulate the size of the pot. They manage to play big pots when they have big hands, and keep the pot smaller when their holdings are more modest. If you think carefully about your betting throughout a hand, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the key skills that winning big-bet players bring to the table is the ability to manipulate the size of the pot. They manage to play big pots when they have big hands, and keep the pot smaller when their holdings are more modest. If you think carefully about your betting throughout a hand, you can set yourself up to play a pot that&#8217;s appropriate for the strength of your hand.</p>
<p>For starters, let&#8217;s look at a hand that gets a lot of players in trouble &#8211; a big pocket pair. Generally, with any one pair, you should be looking to play a medium-sized pot. Of course, you&#8217;re happy enough to get all of your money in pre-flop with Aces, but beyond that, you should try to avoid playing huge pots with any one pair. Here&#8217;s an example of how you might manage the size of the pot while holding Aces.</p>
<p>Say that you raise pre-flop with pocket Aces and you&#8217;re called by the big blind. The flop comes down J-6-3 rainbow, and the blind checks to you. You bet three-quarters of the pot and the big blind calls.</p>
<p>At this point, you can assume your opponent has some kind of hand. Maybe he has a pocket pair or he hit top pair on the flop. The other possibility is that he hit a set on the flop and you&#8217;re in very bad shape. Given these likely hands, I think that checking behind your opponent if he checks to you on the turn is the best play. You avoid the possibility of losing a monster if you&#8217;re check-raised by a set. And if he does have a pair, you&#8217;re not giving away a whole lot of value by giving the free card. He may have two or five outs, which makes him a pretty big dog.</p>
<p>When you check the turn, you do so with the plan of calling a reasonable bet on the river. And if he checks to you on the river, you can put in a small value bet. At that point, your hand would be pretty well disguised, so he is likely to pay you off if he has anything at all.</p>
<p>So in this case, keeping the pot small will get you pretty good value when you&#8217;re ahead and help you avoid disaster when you&#8217;re behind.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s look at another type of hand that players commonly misplay &#8211; a flopped monster. Say you&#8217;re in the big blind in a No-Limit cash game. There are four limpers, including the small blind, and you check your option with A-T. The flop is huge for you &#8211; A-A-T. You have what is almost certain to be the best hand at showdown. Many players choose to check in this spot, fearing that a bet a will kill their action. And it very well might &#8211; it&#8217;s possible that everyone will just fold. But this is a situation where you want to give yourself the chance to win a big pot. You want someone to put in a lot of money on the turn and river while drawing dead, and that will only be possible if you start building a pot on the flop. In this situation, you&#8217;ve just got to hope that someone is holding the case Ace or decides to draw to a gutshot. So bet two-thirds of the pot on the flop and hope for the best.</p>
<p>Slow-playing might get you a few chips when you catch someone stabbing. But that would win you a tiny pot, and with this hand, you&#8217;re hoping to get a good portion of someone&#8217;s stack. You can only do that by betting and building a pot.</p>
<p>In the course of a hand think about what you can do to keep the pot appropriate to the strength of your hand. A timely check or a thoughtful bet can aid you in getting the most out of your hands.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/pro-tip/GavinSmith/88">Source.</a></p>
<img src="http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=157&type=feed" alt=" Gavin Smith    Pot Size Manipulation."  title="Gavin Smith    Pot Size Manipulation." />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/gavin-smith-pot-size-manipulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roy Winston &#8211; I&#8217;d Rather Be a Raiser than a Caller.</title>
		<link>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/roy-winston-id-rather-be-a-raiser-than-a-caller/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/roy-winston-id-rather-be-a-raiser-than-a-caller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beatpoker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cash Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatpoker.co.uk/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless you have a monster draw or are slow playing a big hand, calling is often the wrong play at the table. In fact, it often times takes a stronger hand to make a call than it does to make a raise. &#8220;You raised with that?&#8221; is a question I hear a lot after showing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless you have a monster draw or are slow playing a big hand, calling is often the wrong play at the table. In fact, it often times takes a stronger hand to make a call than it does to make a raise.</p>
<p>&#8220;You raised with that?&#8221; is a question I hear a lot after showing down a hand. You can make a raise with any two cards (sometimes less than that), but it takes a real hand to make a call.</p>
<p>When I’m in late position in an unopened pot and someone in front of me puts in a raise, I’ll always say to myself, &#8220;Hey, I was going to do that!&#8221; The fact is opening a pot with a raise is a good idea because it puts you in control, while cold-calling a raise is not a great option for a variety of reasons.</p>
<p>First of all is the realization that I am probably behind. I have lost the ability to take the lead and be the aggressor, and perhaps represent a wide range of hands. Re-raising in position is always an option. However, if the initial raiser was pretty strong, I could wind up facing a re-raise, which could mean a decision for a lot of chips. I have now put myself in a bad position and made the first of perhaps many mistakes in the hand.</p>
<p>Now, I’m not saying there aren’t hands I like to call with pre-flop. For instance, I’ll limp with hands like ace-rag suited (because you can make the nuts), small pocket pairs (looking to flop a set), sometimes big pocket pairs (to camouflage the strength of my hand) and suited connectors in position. But, making a bad call is almost always worse than making a bad fold.</p>
<p>When in doubt, listen to that little voice in your head saying &#8220;fold, fold, fold.&#8221; Even if it turns out you were ahead in the hand when you folded, it’s still better than making a bad call and losing even more chips.</p>
<p>It takes a great player to make great lay-downs; you have to occasionally fold a winning hand. If you’re not sure what to do with a hand, ask yourself whether or not this is a good place to get your chips in the pot.</p>
<p>A combination of smart and aggressive play will help you to improve your results. And personally, I’d rather be a raiser than a caller&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/pro-tip/RoyWinston/228">Source.</a></p>
<img src="http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=154&type=feed" alt=" Roy Winston   Id Rather Be a Raiser than a Caller."  title="Roy Winston   Id Rather Be a Raiser than a Caller." />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/roy-winston-id-rather-be-a-raiser-than-a-caller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phil Gordon &#8211; Chip Sandwich.</title>
		<link>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/phil-gordon-chip-sandwich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/phil-gordon-chip-sandwich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beatpoker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cash Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Gordon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatpoker.co.uk/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s say an early position opponent &#8211; preferably a loose opponent &#8211; raises and gets called by one or more players. Now there&#8217;s a lot of money in the pot. More importantly, the players who simply called are unlikely to have a hand that would merit calling a big re-raise. If they had such a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s say an early position opponent &#8211; preferably a loose opponent &#8211; raises and gets called by one or more players. Now there&#8217;s a lot of money in the pot. More importantly, the players who simply called are unlikely to have a hand that would merit calling a big re-raise. If they had such a hand, they probably would have raised instead of flat calling in the first place. Now it gets to me.</p>
<p>I &#8220;sandwich&#8221; the callers with a big raise.</p>
<p>If my raise gets the initial raiser to fold, the meat of the chips will very often be coming my way.</p>
<p>I prefer to make this play from the blinds than from the button; if one of the blinds happens to wake up with a great hand, it really doesn&#8217;t matter what the initial raiser was betting with &#8211; my goose is cooked.</p>
<p>I get maximum value from the sandwich raise when I am down to about 15 big blinds. For instance: I&#8217;m in the small blind. A loose player brings it in from early position for three times the big blind. Two players call. There are now 10.5 blinds in the pot. I look down and find 8-7 suited.</p>
<p>I raise all-in.</p>
<p>The initial raiser now has to make the tough decision as to whether to call a significant raise. Even if my timing is off and he has a big hand &#8211; let&#8217;s say A-K &#8211; and decides to call the bet, I&#8217;m still in pretty good shape. My 8-7 suited will beat his A-K about 41% of the time. I&#8217;ve invested 15 big blinds and stand to win 37 big blinds. I&#8217;m getting exactly the right odds on my money here.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t make this play with a hand that can easily be dominated, like a small ace or king. I don&#8217;t want to be 25% (or less) to win if I can help it.</p>
<p>And by making the play all-in, I completely negate my positional disadvantage, and make the most of my short stack. With all of my money in the pot, I can&#8217;t be outplayed after the flop.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s chips you&#8217;re hungry for, try the sandwich. You might just find that it hits the spot.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/pro-tip/PhilGordon/21">Source.</a></p>
<img src="http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=127&type=feed" alt=" Phil Gordon   Chip Sandwich."  title="Phil Gordon   Chip Sandwich." />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beatpoker.co.uk/cashgamestrategy/phil-gordon-chip-sandwich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

